Aviapedia

Mig-31 blueprints

By Pavel | June 2, 2006 on 2:56 pm | In Documentation, MiG-31 Foxhound, Mikoyan |

Right-click to download Mig-31 blueprints.
0,3 Mb, tiff, zip
Some of the Mig-31 blueprints

Materials published with permission of www.airwar.ru

5 Comments »

RSS feed for comments on this post.

ever time i’ve heard about this plane, ten in ten people says that plane is very, very hard to fly.

the question is: how, e why?

Comment by Mauro Oliveira — October 8, 2006 #
Check out answer on forum, please: Mig-31 flight performance

Comment by Pavel — October 11, 2006 #
I am amazed that the MiG-31 “not as maneuverable” as the Su-27! It is probably not as maneuverable as a Zeppelin either. Or as an SR-71…or many other things. It is only the best for the role it was conceived and built. I think this is enough criteria for a plan or a plane.
(By the way, if we are at the Su-subject: is anything as maneuverable ast the new Sukhoys?)

Comment by sicsok — October 17, 2006 #
A Mig-25 once destroyed itself with an 11.5G manuever, and the Mig-31 has even great aerodynamic refinement. It’s lack of manueverability is not nearly as bad as some would have you believe; 5G’s at mach 2.83 is far superior to the 1.5G’s the SR-71 is limited to. In fact, an AV-8B cannot pull more than 4G’s in a sustained turn in level flight at sea level, you normally see those really high G’s in quick turns or on machines like the F-22, which can actually turn tightly enough to enter it’s own ass. In any case, the foxbat/hound can only outmanuever really REALLY sluggish designs such as the Panavia Tornado, which is less manueverable than an F-4. It’s engines get their best performance at mach 2+ and below that they are anemic, and combined with the immense weight from all that steel construction, it’s best when not asked to turn tightly.

Also, doesn’t a Zeppelin have a turn radius of 0? a Ferrari F50 can’t turn around in that area.

Comment by JaderVason — December 18, 2006 #
it’s ment as an interceptor not a figther it has a radar range of 200km and “alamo” missiles that can destroy a target at 40km it’s not ment to get into a dog figth but incase that happens it has short range “archer” missiles.

Comment by arc — January 31, 2007 #