Comments on: Su-37 video http://www.aviapedia.com/fighters/su-37-video Aviation info Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:35:30 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: NoVoice http://www.aviapedia.com/fighters/su-37-video#comment-39508 NoVoice Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:08:24 +0000 http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-37-video#comment-39508 i've read all the comments and you know what, some wrote total nonsense without providing any proof, "like su-37 rules!!!!!!!!!". i see some have knowledge about the planes. someone wrote that we cant know which one is better because f-22 and su-37 never fought with each other, that's true. someone can get 100% on a test and not be good at it in real life, in other words we all can look at the characteristics of the planes, but that's not enough. we need to see them in REAL battle not in a stimulator. those planes are both new, therefore some characteristics are still kept in secret. TO Crew Dawg, su-37 combats wins 0, do you think that su-37 participated in a combat at all? Mig-29 wins 1 against another Mig-29, was that russian? or Ukranian or what? depends who is piloting. Some countries dont have money to make top quality training for each fighter pilot. However US wont put a noob in a new machine, so wont Russia. i’ve read all the comments and you know what, some wrote total nonsense without providing any proof, “like su-37 rules!!!!!!!!!”. i see some have knowledge about the planes. someone wrote that we cant know which one is better because f-22 and su-37 never fought with each other, that’s true. someone can get 100% on a test and not be good at it in real life, in other words we all can look at the characteristics of the planes, but that’s not enough. we need to see them in REAL battle not in a stimulator. those planes are both new, therefore some characteristics are still kept in secret.
TO Crew Dawg, su-37 combats wins 0, do you think that su-37 participated in a combat at all? Mig-29 wins 1 against another Mig-29, was that russian? or Ukranian or what? depends who is piloting. Some countries dont have money to make top quality training for each fighter pilot. However US wont put a noob in a new machine, so wont Russia.

]]> By: NoVoice http://www.aviapedia.com/fighters/su-37-video#comment-39507 NoVoice Tue, 11 Nov 2008 13:15:36 +0000 http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-37-video#comment-39507 Some of you posted really food comments and some wrote BULLSHIT without giving any proof. someone wrote that we cant know which one is better because f-22 and su-37 never fought, that's right. The point is that both of those planes are new, even if we do research we cant know which one is better because at this time the key capabilities are kept in secret. Some of you posted really food comments and some wrote BULLSHIT without giving any proof. someone wrote that we cant know which one is better because f-22 and su-37 never fought, that’s right. The point is that both of those planes are new, even if we do research we cant know which one is better because at this time the key capabilities are kept in secret.

]]> By: Crew Dawg http://www.aviapedia.com/fighters/su-37-video#comment-39444 Crew Dawg Sun, 28 Sep 2008 04:07:35 +0000 http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-37-video#comment-39444 Why don't we just look at the facts? Su-37 combat victories = zero. The F-15 currently stands at 105 wins to 0 losses in aerial combat. And correct me if I'm wrong but I believe the Mig-29 only aerial victory was against another Mig-29. I guess it goes to show that you can shine a turd, but it's still just a turd. Why don’t we just look at the facts? Su-37 combat victories = zero. The F-15 currently stands at 105 wins to 0 losses in aerial combat. And correct me if I’m wrong but I believe the Mig-29 only aerial victory was against another Mig-29. I guess it goes to show that you can shine a turd, but it’s still just a turd.

]]> By: maurie http://www.aviapedia.com/fighters/su-37-video#comment-39310 maurie Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:19:15 +0000 http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-37-video#comment-39310 I find some of the comnments amusing , some are based with facts the german aiforce has 24 mig 29's in operation inherated from the former east germany and these aifcraft are the older first gen mig 29 , they have the archer missle fitted and helmet display. what the germans found after learning to fly and use the mig 29's full potential is that they kick ass, they had a perfect kill ratio against any western fighter. This shocked the u.s airforce who arranged to have the germans bring the mig 29 to italy and dogfight with the u.s f16's based there. Again the mig did as expected performing admiraly tho the f 16's where able to score some kills against the mig 29 , but not as the u.s airforce predicted in coclusion the us pilots said the f 16 was a better plane to fly and easier to fly than the mig 29 ,but none of them wish to ever come up against the mig 29 in combat because its a deadly mother in the right hands, I also read another blog recently about the f22 and the su 37 super flanker most su 35's have been upgraded to super flanker spec and in the words of one u.s general he said and i quote: The f22 has stealth but the su 35 have over the horizon rader which in theory can pick up an f22 , and if the f22 cannot get shot off first then god help the f22 pilot cos the f22 cant outrun the su 35 nor can it out manouver the su 35 , This means that if the f22 pilot misses the su will pick him up and its game over . The su 35 can also detect when the f22 fires its missles not to mention the su 35 will soon have if it doesnt already rear firing missles. So if i were buying the latest gen fighter to protect my country i would buy the su 35 its cheaper , its deadly and probably the best attack fighter in the world today !!! I find some of the comnments amusing , some are based with facts the german aiforce has 24 mig 29’s in operation inherated from the former east germany and these aifcraft are the older first gen mig 29 , they have the archer missle fitted and helmet display. what the germans found after learning to fly and use the mig 29’s full potential is that they kick ass, they had a perfect kill ratio against any western fighter. This shocked the u.s airforce who arranged to have the germans bring the mig 29 to italy and dogfight with the u.s f16’s based there. Again the mig did as expected performing admiraly tho the f 16’s where able to score some kills against the mig 29 , but not as the u.s airforce predicted in coclusion the us pilots said the f 16 was a better plane to fly and easier to fly than the mig 29 ,but none of them wish to ever come up against the mig 29 in combat because its a deadly mother in the right hands, I also read another blog recently about the f22 and the su 37 super flanker most su 35’s have been upgraded to super flanker spec and in the words of one u.s general he said and i quote: The f22 has stealth but the su 35 have over the horizon rader which in theory can pick up an f22 , and if the f22 cannot get shot off first then god help the f22 pilot cos the f22 cant outrun the su 35 nor can it out manouver the su 35 , This means that if the f22 pilot misses the su will pick him up and its game over . The su 35 can also detect when the f22 fires its missles not to mention the su 35 will soon have if it doesnt already rear firing missles. So if i were buying the latest gen fighter to protect my country i would buy the su 35 its cheaper , its deadly and probably the best attack fighter in the world today !!!

]]> By: Dave http://www.aviapedia.com/fighters/su-37-video#comment-38793 Dave Mon, 05 May 2008 16:24:25 +0000 http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-37-video#comment-38793 What Yellow 000 wrote on December 1, 2007 is probably one of the most fallible statements ever conceived in history. Air ceiling, speed, and maneuverability can be key in battle, however; there was something that came about a long time ago called strategy. Via weapons upgrades in capability as well as the amazing fact that humans aren't robots, the battle could tip either way. There are too many variables to be considered, especially when the most dynamic of which is the human piloting the craft. I'm not coming from the point of a smart-ass like some who have posted on this forum but I am not picking favorites either. Both the Su-37 as well as the F-22 are on my top 5 list because of the innovative feats their designers have achieved through building and honing these deadly beasts. The most important thing to consider is strategy and how humans implement that to the best of their abilities given their brain capacity and amazing engineering. By the way, Yellow 000, if you ever do read this don't be hurt, just understand that you have written from an extremely narrow viewpoint and I wanted to share with you and everyone else what I know about these planes. What Yellow 000 wrote on December 1, 2007 is probably one of the most fallible statements ever conceived in history. Air ceiling, speed, and maneuverability can be key in battle, however; there was something that came about a long time ago called strategy. Via weapons upgrades in capability as well as the amazing fact that humans aren’t robots, the battle could tip either way. There are too many variables to be considered, especially when the most dynamic of which is the human piloting the craft. I’m not coming from the point of a smart-ass like some who have posted on this forum but I am not picking favorites either. Both the Su-37 as well as the F-22 are on my top 5 list because of the innovative feats their designers have achieved through building and honing these deadly beasts. The most important thing to consider is strategy and how humans implement that to the best of their abilities given their brain capacity and amazing engineering. By the way, Yellow 000, if you ever do read this don’t be hurt, just understand that you have written from an extremely narrow viewpoint and I wanted to share with you and everyone else what I know about these planes.

]]> By: brian http://www.aviapedia.com/fighters/su-37-video#comment-38029 brian Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:33:10 +0000 http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-37-video#comment-38029 que chingon a vion pero no se com para cn el f-22,mi-31 y el f-16 pero de todos mosdos es ta chingon pardre llo soy un fanatico de los aviones de guerra saludos a los pilotos y a todos los que bisitan es ta pajina que chingon a vion pero no se com para cn el f-22,mi-31 y el f-16 pero de todos mosdos es ta chingon pardre

llo soy un fanatico de los aviones de guerra

saludos a los pilotos y a todos los que bisitan es ta pajina

]]> By: Robert A. Stone http://www.aviapedia.com/fighters/su-37-video#comment-35258 Robert A. Stone Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:57:09 +0000 http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-37-video#comment-35258 I agree with what Richard states about Russia and the United States that he wrote may 25,2007. The US and Russia should work together and quit letting polititians get involved. Although competition is a good thing, it can lead to the wrong outcome if not kept in check. Their(Russian) technology is excellent and just like our own, the best is and will remain classified on a need to know basis where weapons are concerned....Robert I agree with what Richard states about Russia and the United States that he wrote may 25,2007. The US and Russia should work together and quit letting polititians get involved. Although competition is a good thing, it can lead to the wrong outcome if not kept in check. Their(Russian) technology is excellent and just like our own, the best is and will remain classified on a need to know basis where weapons are concerned….Robert

]]> By: Ace http://www.aviapedia.com/fighters/su-37-video#comment-34371 Ace Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:04:38 +0000 http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-37-video#comment-34371 Lenny, Dogfights don't even exist anymore not with all the long range missiles and such Lenny,
Dogfights don’t even exist anymore not with all the long range missiles and such

]]> By: Lenny http://www.aviapedia.com/fighters/su-37-video#comment-32736 Lenny Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:09:25 +0000 http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-37-video#comment-32736 Hey, how about we all just agree that this is a frickin' awesome aircraft. Personally, it would kick the F-22's butt, but I don't know. and about dogfights, who knows. It could happen. Hey, how about we all just agree that this is a frickin’ awesome aircraft. Personally, it would kick the F-22’s butt, but I don’t know. and about dogfights, who knows. It could happen.

]]> By: Ace http://www.aviapedia.com/fighters/su-37-video#comment-32337 Ace Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:44:57 +0000 http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-37-video#comment-32337 O rite, hey su-37 lover thats wrong completely. The F-22 has a celing of 55000 tops 4100 ft lower than 37 but it has a top speed of 1400mph plus supercruise which lets it go at 900 mph without afterburner so when the 37 pilot runs away wetting his pants the 22 will be on top of him no problem. And also ur lying, the only way that russian piece of shit radar (or what they call radar) cant pick up the f-22 the only way that would happen was if the 22 pilot turned off his stealth countermeasures and he does that only in civialian airspace to prevent crashes. Also the 37 does have better manuverability ill give u that but do dogfights really happen anymore u obviously have a mental issue so ill give u the answer NO! AAll planes need to be manuverable enough for is to evade enemy's missiles and the AIM- 120 is way More maneuverable than the KS-172 so the SU-37 might as well SUCK MY ASS! O rite, hey su-37 lover thats wrong completely. The F-22 has a celing of 55000 tops 4100 ft lower than 37 but it has a top speed of 1400mph plus supercruise which lets it go at 900 mph without afterburner so when the 37 pilot runs away wetting his pants the 22 will be on top of him no problem. And also ur lying, the only way that russian piece of shit radar (or what they call radar) cant pick up the f-22 the only way that would happen was if the 22 pilot turned off his stealth countermeasures and he does that only in civialian airspace to prevent crashes. Also the 37 does have better manuverability ill give u that but do dogfights really happen anymore u obviously have a mental issue so ill give u the answer NO! AAll planes need to be manuverable enough for is to evade enemy’s missiles and the AIM- 120 is way More maneuverable than the KS-172 so the SU-37 might as well SUCK MY ASS!

]]>