Aviapedia forum  

Go Back   Aviapedia forum > General aviation > General discussions
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-01-2008, 10:05 AM
Nedo Nedo is offline
Pilot
Reputation: 28
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 49
Nedo is on a distinguished road
Default help in translation about tu-22m3

Hello;

I am not speaking russian, but I am from Bosnia country with South Slavic peoples.
I watch Udarnaja sila episode about Tu-22m3 and I understand that tu-22m3 modernization is underway and that their service life would be increase.
But I don't understand for how long. I think that they say for "sorog let", which means 40 years. So, because these aircraft were produced 1984-1992, that means they will stay in service minimum till 2024-2032.
Is this correct?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-01-2008, 04:24 PM
SepheronX's Avatar
SepheronX SepheronX is offline
Class 3 pilot
Reputation: 24
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Calgary Alberta, Canada
Posts: 53
SepheronX is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to SepheronX Send a message via Skype™ to SepheronX
Default

In all respect, these aircrafts are amazing, like all Russian based aircrafts. But unlike the SU-35BM and the PAK FA, all their other aircrafts are upgrades from those in the past. They should just try to fund a possible cheaper and more effective rout for future aviations to completely replace these TU-22 and SU-27 upgraded variants, or Mig-29 variants (Mig-31 should stay, as it is amazing as it is).

Last edited by SepheronX : 04-01-2008 at 04:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-10-2008, 03:20 PM
Tass Tass is offline
Rookie
Reputation: 10
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South of the equator
Posts: 3
Tass is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nedo
So, because these aircraft were produced 1984-1992, that means they will stay in service minimum till 2024-2032.
Is this correct?

From what I've read, yes to around 2020-25


Quote:
Originally Posted by SepheronX
They should just try to fund a possible cheaper and more effective rout for future aviations to completely replace these TU-22 and SU-27 upgraded variants, or Mig-29 variants (Mig-31 should stay, as it is amazing as it is).



I disagree...the bomber fleet inherited from the Soviet Union is actually in pretty good shape due to them not being flown much until the last couple of years. As most of them were built during the second half of the 80's and were hardly flown during the 90's, it makes sense to upgrade them.

The TU-22M Backfire is a formidable aircraft and is available in large numbers.

When modified to carry the latest generation PGMs it gives the VVS a distinct edge over any other airforce in the Eurasian continent. There are reports that among other weaponry, it will carry 2 x Kh-101 (102) long range cruise missiles (approx 5000 km range)
Reply With Quote
Reply



Incredible-Adventures

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Aviapedia.com
Cheap Electricity - Loans - Credit Cards - Loans