<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Su-34 &#8216;Fullback&#8217; to replace Su-24 and Tu-22M3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aviapedia.com/news/su-34-to-replace-su-24-and-tu-22m3-20060330/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aviapedia.com/news/su-34-to-replace-su-24-and-tu-22m3-20060330</link>
	<description>Aviation info</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 02:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ugo</title>
		<link>http://www.aviapedia.com/news/su-34-to-replace-su-24-and-tu-22m3-20060330#comment-19393</link>
		<dc:creator>ugo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aviapedia.com/news/su-34-to-replace-su-24-and-tu-22m3#comment-19393</guid>
		<description>this is a great new aircraft from sukhoi companie, very nice aircraft 
why NATO  call this beutyfull aircraf fullback
this is just jeulous emotion, because his airplanes, those are not so beutyfull like russian aircratf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is a great new aircraft from sukhoi companie, very nice aircraft<br />
why NATO  call this beutyfull aircraf fullback<br />
this is just jeulous emotion, because his airplanes, those are not so beutyfull like russian aircratf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graywolf</title>
		<link>http://www.aviapedia.com/news/su-34-to-replace-su-24-and-tu-22m3-20060330#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>Graywolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 18:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aviapedia.com/news/su-34-to-replace-su-24-and-tu-22m3#comment-385</guid>
		<description>I think its a good aircraft to replace the Tu-22</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its a good aircraft to replace the Tu-22</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikolay</title>
		<link>http://www.aviapedia.com/news/su-34-to-replace-su-24-and-tu-22m3-20060330#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikolay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 23:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aviapedia.com/news/su-34-to-replace-su-24-and-tu-22m3#comment-373</guid>
		<description>I think that they mean to replace all versions of the Tu 22. Not so much for their lack of capabilaties but b/c they are expencive to maintain.
 Su-34 will probably be cheaper to maintain b/c of how many parts it shares with the hole Su 27 family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that they mean to replace all versions of the Tu 22. Not so much for their lack of capabilaties but b/c they are expencive to maintain.<br />
 Su-34 will probably be cheaper to maintain b/c of how many parts it shares with the hole Su 27 family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Munzy</title>
		<link>http://www.aviapedia.com/news/su-34-to-replace-su-24-and-tu-22m3-20060330#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>Munzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 12:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aviapedia.com/news/su-34-to-replace-su-24-and-tu-22m3#comment-327</guid>
		<description>Although the Tu 22m3 is getting old, the russians should focus on replacing the Tu 22, m1 and m2 versions still is service instead of replacing the Tu 22m3 which is still a very capable aircraft</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although the Tu 22m3 is getting old, the russians should focus on replacing the Tu 22, m1 and m2 versions still is service instead of replacing the Tu 22m3 which is still a very capable aircraft</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
