Comments on: Su-32 Fullback video

By: BackToUSSR

BackToUSSR — Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:59:45 +0000

For F-22 to carry as much as Su-32 and fly as far (outside pylons and extra tanks unavoidable ofcourse), I guess Raptor can kiss a big GOODBYE to it’s Stealth.

So tell me, how long will F-22 survive if it even tries approaching Su-34’s capabilities?

By: Pavel

Pavel — Sat, 25 Aug 2007 14:57:03 +0000

LOL, thanks for your comment. Could you tell us, please, the difference between Su-32 and Su-34 ? With official sources, if possible.

By: LOL

LOL — Sat, 18 Aug 2007 04:49:01 +0000

This is a video of the SU-32… not 34, and the F-22 is a bomber as well, it only carries 2 sidewinders… the rest are bombs.

By: xDx

xDx — Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:04:11 +0000

Stop talking bullshit retard , you dont know anything about avionics obviusly…
Su-34 is a Strike Aircraft , original role is ground support and bombing , it was not intended for Air to Air combat so stop comparing him to F-22 Raptor

By: Desolate

Desolate — Tue, 19 Jun 2007 02:21:58 +0000

The Fullback is a much MUCH larger aircraft than the Raptor, and it doesnt have stealth technology. The Raptor can easily hold its own in a dogfight where as the Fullback (slug) would be an easy target. Hands down to the F-22 Rapot in that showdown.

By: TIZ

TIZ — Sun, 27 May 2007 19:53:49 +0000

All this is is a large fighter bomber that’s trying to do everything… Ultimatelt it will be less effective than the F111 and not even in the same ballpark as the RAPTOR…

By: Antony Lakone

Antony Lakone — Sun, 15 Apr 2007 11:07:02 +0000

Cool, they must head to head with F-22 Raptor. And I guess that this fullback will be the winner!!!

By: Vic

Vic — Tue, 30 Jan 2007 05:36:04 +0000

which if made in the U.S. would probably cost aroun $ 100 million

By: Vic

Vic — Tue, 30 Jan 2007 05:31:24 +0000

Its cost is 1 billion russian rubles and about $37 million

By: mes

mes — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 21:09:22 +0000

this is a bomber, not fighter.

два полка ставят сейчас на вооружение