<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Su-35 Super Flanker video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-35-video/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-35-video</link>
	<description>Aviation info</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sanjtosh meena</title>
		<link>http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-35-video/comment-page-1#comment-39749</link>
		<dc:creator>sanjtosh meena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 04:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-35-video#comment-39749</guid>
		<description>i wana fling su 35</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wana fling su 35</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanjtosh meena</title>
		<link>http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-35-video/comment-page-1#comment-39748</link>
		<dc:creator>sanjtosh meena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 04:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-35-video#comment-39748</guid>
		<description>i m india so i wana new design for fighter jet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i m india so i wana new design for fighter jet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reza barootian</title>
		<link>http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-35-video/comment-page-1#comment-39601</link>
		<dc:creator>reza barootian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 09:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-35-video#comment-39601</guid>
		<description>su</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>su</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pavel</title>
		<link>http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-35-video/comment-page-1#comment-39570</link>
		<dc:creator>Pavel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 12:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-35-video#comment-39570</guid>
		<description>Nice analytics! Do you know the history between He-100 and Bf-109? He-100 was brilliant, the best fighter in the world that time. Clean aerodinamics, faster then Bf-109 etc. etc. Record-braker. But during all the WW2 Germans were flying ugly square Bf-109. Wonder why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice analytics! Do you know the history between He-100 and Bf-109? He-100 was brilliant, the best fighter in the world that time. Clean aerodinamics, faster then Bf-109 etc. etc. Record-braker. But during all the WW2 Germans were flying ugly square Bf-109. Wonder why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phattyre</title>
		<link>http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-35-video/comment-page-1#comment-39567</link>
		<dc:creator>phattyre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 05:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-35-video#comment-39567</guid>
		<description>su-35 max recorded speed mach 2.3
f-22 max recorded speed mach 2.5 plus gov,t will not release top speed info which is actually speculated to be around 2.8 f-22 wins
supercruise speed
su-35 mach 1.2-1.5 documented average
f-22 mach 1.5-1.82 documented average
f-22 wins again
thrust ratios low and high
su-35 0.84-1.14 to 1
f-22 1.08-1.26 to 1
which means the raptor has quicker acceleration and climb rate f-22 wins again
thrust vectoring
su-35 3d vectorng at+/- 15 degrees
f-22 2d vectoring at +/- 20 degrees
which means the f-22 can pull tighter turns at higher speeds now as for the 3d vectoring it just means ths the su-37 can roll tighter and quicker congradulations. f-22 wins in combat su-37 wins in air show. oh by the way all the manuvers by the su-37 you see on the videos can be done by the raptor to. so dont go thinking your plane is speacial. also those manuvers are useless in combat they make you a sitting duck.
climb rate
su-35 280ms
f-22 unknown faster than f-15 that is known
but based on thrust ratio f-22 wins
max ceiling
su-35 59000 ft
f-22 60000+ft and can still perform at these alttitudes
f-22 wins again
engine max thrust
su-35 30855 lbs each total both 61710 lbs
f-22 35000+ lbs each total both 70000+ lbs
f-22 wins
stealth capabilties
su-35 very limited
f-22 radar and infared signal absorbing technology lessened heat signature lessened visual profile
radar and detection jamming equipment of classified specs. internal weapon load
f-22 wins
weapons load
f-22
Guns: 1Ã— 20 mm (0.787 in) M61A2 Vulcan gatling gun in starboard wing root, 480 rounds
Air to air loadout:
6Ã— AIM-120 AMRAAM
2Ã— AIM-9 Sidewinder
Air to ground loadout:
2Ã— AIM-120 AMRAAM and
2Ã— AIM-9 Sidewinder and one of the following:
2Ã— 1,000 lb (450 kg) JDAM or
2Ã— Wind Corrected Munitions Dispensers (WCMDs) or
8Ã— 250 lb (110 kg) GBU-39 Small Diameter Bombs
Hardpoints: 4Ã— under-wing pylon stations can be fitted to carry 600 US gallon Sargent Fletcher drop tanks or weapons, each with a capacity of about 5,000 lb max payload around 21030
su-35
One GSh-30-1 30mm cannon 103 rounds, plus up to 18,075 lb including R-73/R-77 AAMs, ASMs, bombs, rockets, drop tanks, and ECM pods carried on fourteen external points. max payload around 17640 lbs
f-22 wins again
range
su-35 2175 miles
f-22 1841 miles
su-37 wins thats a first
g loads
su-35 9+gs
f-22 9+gs
rough tie
radar
su-35 can see a normal target at 248 mile
supposed stealth tech is at 50 mile
f-22 can see a normal target at 250 miles stealth tech classified
considering the su-35 has very limited stealth capabilities and the f-22 has alot of stealth tech
which means the f-22 can see the su-35 at 200 miles at the least while the su-35 has to wait until it is within 50 miles to see the f-22
f-22 wins
shall I continue the slaughter of su-35 because I can
so as you see the su-35 is basically a suped f-15e with thrust vectoring it is a great plane to go up against f-15,f-16,and f-18â€™s but it does not even compare or even have a prayer against a f-22 better luck with the pak fa but from I am seeing from reports same old story as the su-35.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>su-35 max recorded speed mach 2.3<br />
f-22 max recorded speed mach 2.5 plus gov,t will not release top speed info which is actually speculated to be around 2.8 f-22 wins<br />
supercruise speed<br />
su-35 mach 1.2-1.5 documented average<br />
f-22 mach 1.5-1.82 documented average<br />
f-22 wins again<br />
thrust ratios low and high<br />
su-35 0.84-1.14 to 1<br />
f-22 1.08-1.26 to 1<br />
which means the raptor has quicker acceleration and climb rate f-22 wins again<br />
thrust vectoring<br />
su-35 3d vectorng at+/- 15 degrees<br />
f-22 2d vectoring at +/- 20 degrees<br />
which means the f-22 can pull tighter turns at higher speeds now as for the 3d vectoring it just means ths the su-37 can roll tighter and quicker congradulations. f-22 wins in combat su-37 wins in air show. oh by the way all the manuvers by the su-37 you see on the videos can be done by the raptor to. so dont go thinking your plane is speacial. also those manuvers are useless in combat they make you a sitting duck.<br />
climb rate<br />
su-35 280ms<br />
f-22 unknown faster than f-15 that is known<br />
but based on thrust ratio f-22 wins<br />
max ceiling<br />
su-35 59000 ft<br />
f-22 60000+ft and can still perform at these alttitudes<br />
f-22 wins again<br />
engine max thrust<br />
su-35 30855 lbs each total both 61710 lbs<br />
f-22 35000+ lbs each total both 70000+ lbs<br />
f-22 wins<br />
stealth capabilties<br />
su-35 very limited<br />
f-22 radar and infared signal absorbing technology lessened heat signature lessened visual profile<br />
radar and detection jamming equipment of classified specs. internal weapon load<br />
f-22 wins<br />
weapons load<br />
f-22<br />
Guns: 1Ã— 20 mm (0.787 in) M61A2 Vulcan gatling gun in starboard wing root, 480 rounds<br />
Air to air loadout:<br />
6Ã— AIM-120 AMRAAM<br />
2Ã— AIM-9 Sidewinder<br />
Air to ground loadout:<br />
2Ã— AIM-120 AMRAAM and<br />
2Ã— AIM-9 Sidewinder and one of the following:<br />
2Ã— 1,000 lb (450 kg) JDAM or<br />
2Ã— Wind Corrected Munitions Dispensers (WCMDs) or<br />
8Ã— 250 lb (110 kg) GBU-39 Small Diameter Bombs<br />
Hardpoints: 4Ã— under-wing pylon stations can be fitted to carry 600 US gallon Sargent Fletcher drop tanks or weapons, each with a capacity of about 5,000 lb max payload around 21030<br />
su-35<br />
One GSh-30-1 30mm cannon 103 rounds, plus up to 18,075 lb including R-73/R-77 AAMs, ASMs, bombs, rockets, drop tanks, and ECM pods carried on fourteen external points. max payload around 17640 lbs<br />
f-22 wins again<br />
range<br />
su-35 2175 miles<br />
f-22 1841 miles<br />
su-37 wins thats a first<br />
g loads<br />
su-35 9+gs<br />
f-22 9+gs<br />
rough tie<br />
radar<br />
su-35 can see a normal target at 248 mile<br />
supposed stealth tech is at 50 mile<br />
f-22 can see a normal target at 250 miles stealth tech classified<br />
considering the su-35 has very limited stealth capabilities and the f-22 has alot of stealth tech<br />
which means the f-22 can see the su-35 at 200 miles at the least while the su-35 has to wait until it is within 50 miles to see the f-22<br />
f-22 wins<br />
shall I continue the slaughter of su-35 because I can<br />
so as you see the su-35 is basically a suped f-15e with thrust vectoring it is a great plane to go up against f-15,f-16,and f-18â€™s but it does not even compare or even have a prayer against a f-22 better luck with the pak fa but from I am seeing from reports same old story as the su-35.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d-man</title>
		<link>http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-35-video/comment-page-1#comment-39464</link>
		<dc:creator>d-man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-35-video#comment-39464</guid>
		<description>ha, ha the question is this can this plane take on the f-22 raptor? no, i don't think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ha, ha the question is this can this plane take on the f-22 raptor? no, i don&#8217;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djvic</title>
		<link>http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-35-video/comment-page-1#comment-27104</link>
		<dc:creator>djvic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 19:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-35-video#comment-27104</guid>
		<description>If you like to perform acrobatics this is the aircraft....if you want to fight and win, choose the old F-15...don't even speak about the US's newest fighter in this "old" class....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you like to perform acrobatics this is the aircraft&#8230;.if you want to fight and win, choose the old F-15&#8230;don&#8217;t even speak about the US&#8217;s newest fighter in this &#8220;old&#8221; class&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keivan</title>
		<link>http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-35-video/comment-page-1#comment-20727</link>
		<dc:creator>keivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 03:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-35-video#comment-20727</guid>
		<description>Excellent...already historical video that was so imazing.could you please put the complete movie whitout previewing the people. thank's a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent&#8230;already historical video that was so imazing.could you please put the complete movie whitout previewing the people. thank&#8217;s a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amir</title>
		<link>http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-35-video/comment-page-1#comment-19285</link>
		<dc:creator>amir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-35-video#comment-19285</guid>
		<description>thank you for this movie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you for this movie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Munzy</title>
		<link>http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-35-video/comment-page-1#comment-10693</link>
		<dc:creator>Munzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 05:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aviapedia.com/video/su-35-video#comment-10693</guid>
		<description>ha! In air to air combat the F-15's would be mauld so baddly by the Su-30, 33, 35, and 37. The Su-37 is nearly a totally new plane, the f-15 is old and no matter how many missiles the Eagle launched, the Su-37 could easily out manouver them with it's thrust vectoring and canards.

The Su-37 can turn on the spot, it takes the F-15 several miles to do a 180 degree turn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ha! In air to air combat the F-15&#8217;s would be mauld so baddly by the Su-30, 33, 35, and 37. The Su-37 is nearly a totally new plane, the f-15 is old and no matter how many missiles the Eagle launched, the Su-37 could easily out manouver them with it&#8217;s thrust vectoring and canards.</p>
<p>The Su-37 can turn on the spot, it takes the F-15 several miles to do a 180 degree turn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
