<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thunderbirds video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aviapedia.com/video/thunderbirds-video/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aviapedia.com/video/thunderbirds-video</link>
	<description>Aviation info</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frenesi</title>
		<link>http://www.aviapedia.com/video/thunderbirds-video#comment-39290</link>
		<dc:creator>Frenesi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 18:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aviapedia.com/video/thunderbirds-video#comment-39290</guid>
		<description>I think that the Russian Knight are very good but they are'nt very agressive like the thunderbirds.
Blue angels have a very good aircraft but the same idea like the Russian Knight.
Thunderbirds are the best because they are very agressive to fly and I like that.

Think the Thunderbirds flying Su-35!! jajaj.

I never see in live the Thunderbirds team in Chile or Blueangels.
They will should to visit other countries like Chile or other countries friend.
I know that it's very imposible! jaja
but I wish that very mush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the Russian Knight are very good but they are&#8217;nt very agressive like the thunderbirds.<br />
Blue angels have a very good aircraft but the same idea like the Russian Knight.<br />
Thunderbirds are the best because they are very agressive to fly and I like that.</p>
<p>Think the Thunderbirds flying Su-35!! jajaj.</p>
<p>I never see in live the Thunderbirds team in Chile or Blueangels.<br />
They will should to visit other countries like Chile or other countries friend.<br />
I know that it&#8217;s very imposible! jaja<br />
but I wish that very mush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fredric Nordstrom</title>
		<link>http://www.aviapedia.com/video/thunderbirds-video#comment-38663</link>
		<dc:creator>Fredric Nordstrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 10:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aviapedia.com/video/thunderbirds-video#comment-38663</guid>
		<description>Enough with the "what if" fights!!! The F-16 may be more agile at certain speeds, but being smaller it has a less capable radar than the Su27 as far as poweroutput is concerned and therefore less "range". The antenna is smaller so it captures less reflected energy too, reducing the probability to detect targets at specific ranges even furhter... Larger planes can carry larger antennas/TWT's and has more room for cooling the TWT, more room for signal processors etc. The F-16 should therefore be no match for a larger fighter like the F-14, F-15, JA37, Tornado F3 or the Su27.
The Russians were never an "international super-power". Back in the days of the cold war the russians did not do much in the way of "controling the world" when compared to UK, France and especialy USA. American hubris is so funny... they are never, not ever wrong... anything they do is for the "greater good". I saw someone on TV say that in a democracy the military is controlled by civilians. But in USA the military is controlled by commercial/financial interrests. The politicians that makes the decitions are buddies with the rich dudes that sell weapons to the military and the dudes to wich the military is lent out to do the heavy lifting for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enough with the &#8220;what if&#8221; fights!!! The F-16 may be more agile at certain speeds, but being smaller it has a less capable radar than the Su27 as far as poweroutput is concerned and therefore less &#8220;range&#8221;. The antenna is smaller so it captures less reflected energy too, reducing the probability to detect targets at specific ranges even furhter&#8230; Larger planes can carry larger antennas/TWT&#8217;s and has more room for cooling the TWT, more room for signal processors etc. The F-16 should therefore be no match for a larger fighter like the F-14, F-15, JA37, Tornado F3 or the Su27.<br />
The Russians were never an &#8220;international super-power&#8221;. Back in the days of the cold war the russians did not do much in the way of &#8220;controling the world&#8221; when compared to UK, France and especialy USA. American hubris is so funny&#8230; they are never, not ever wrong&#8230; anything they do is for the &#8220;greater good&#8221;. I saw someone on TV say that in a democracy the military is controlled by civilians. But in USA the military is controlled by commercial/financial interrests. The politicians that makes the decitions are buddies with the rich dudes that sell weapons to the military and the dudes to wich the military is lent out to do the heavy lifting for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddaniels</title>
		<link>http://www.aviapedia.com/video/thunderbirds-video#comment-37662</link>
		<dc:creator>ddaniels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 07:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aviapedia.com/video/thunderbirds-video#comment-37662</guid>
		<description>If the Russians were the best, they would still be an International Super-Power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Russians were the best, they would still be an International Super-Power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cqonealkaff</title>
		<link>http://www.aviapedia.com/video/thunderbirds-video#comment-26680</link>
		<dc:creator>cqonealkaff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 06:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aviapedia.com/video/thunderbirds-video#comment-26680</guid>
		<description>Still the Russian are the best...!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still the Russian are the best&#8230;!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ace</title>
		<link>http://www.aviapedia.com/video/thunderbirds-video#comment-20747</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 22:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aviapedia.com/video/thunderbirds-video#comment-20747</guid>
		<description>P.S.: If the F-16s Went against the Su-27 (or 37) The Su's would get ripped up!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S.: If the F-16s Went against the Su-27 (or 37) The Su&#8217;s would get ripped up!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ace</title>
		<link>http://www.aviapedia.com/video/thunderbirds-video#comment-18622</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 23:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aviapedia.com/video/thunderbirds-video#comment-18622</guid>
		<description>Yes, USAF's Aces are the ulimate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, USAF&#8217;s Aces are the ulimate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crazy Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.aviapedia.com/video/thunderbirds-video#comment-18570</link>
		<dc:creator>Crazy Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 14:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aviapedia.com/video/thunderbirds-video#comment-18570</guid>
		<description>I've never seen any Russian teams fly such a tight formation.  Hallmark of good "precision" jet flying team (since jets can't do what Sean Tucker can) is a super-tight formation through any manuever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never seen any Russian teams fly such a tight formation.  Hallmark of good &#8220;precision&#8221; jet flying team (since jets can&#8217;t do what Sean Tucker can) is a super-tight formation through any manuever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mette</title>
		<link>http://www.aviapedia.com/video/thunderbirds-video#comment-18150</link>
		<dc:creator>Mette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aviapedia.com/video/thunderbirds-video#comment-18150</guid>
		<description>Music played by:

Queen Of The Damned

Song:

Body Crumbles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Music played by:</p>
<p>Queen Of The Damned</p>
<p>Song:</p>
<p>Body Crumbles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rods</title>
		<link>http://www.aviapedia.com/video/thunderbirds-video#comment-10638</link>
		<dc:creator>Rods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 03:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aviapedia.com/video/thunderbirds-video#comment-10638</guid>
		<description>Who is playing the music?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is playing the music?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WitchKing</title>
		<link>http://www.aviapedia.com/video/thunderbirds-video#comment-5277</link>
		<dc:creator>WitchKing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 19:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aviapedia.com/video/thunderbirds-video#comment-5277</guid>
		<description>Yes. I agree with all of you. But the Russian Knights are not so expressive like SU-30MKI.
Its flight is not so nice, its fantastic. Especially during the last MAKS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. I agree with all of you. But the Russian Knights are not so expressive like SU-30MKI.<br />
Its flight is not so nice, its fantastic. Especially during the last MAKS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
